Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (803K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Zwieb, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dahlberg, A. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Zwieb, C.
Right arrow Articles by Dahlberg, A. E.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1984, Vol. 12, No. 10 4361-4375
© 1984


MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Point mutations in the middle of 16S ribosomal RNA of E. coli produced by deletion loop mutagenesis

Christian Zwieb and Albert E. Dahlberg

Division of Biology and Medicine, Brown University Providence, RI 02912, USA

Received February 2, 1984. Revised April 17, 1984. Accepted April 17, 1984.

Using the plasmid pKK3535, which contains the rrnB operon of Escherlchia coli in pBR322, a deletion mutation was constructed which lacks bases 822 to 874 in the middle of the 16S ribosomal RNA. This results in an "amputation" of a very distinct stem and loop structure in the RNA. By forming a heteroduplex between the deletion plasmid and the original pKK3535 and by modifying the single-stranded deletion loops with bisulfite, we produced plasmids containing one or two base changes at positions 839, 840, 841, 867 or 876. The clustering of the mutations near the top of the stem, and the inability to get base changes at other positions, suggests that single alterations at particular positions severely affect the formation of a functional ribosome. The ability to recover mutations at these positions is not determined by the secondary structure of the DNA during bisulfite mutagenesis. Restriction enzyme analysis of 12 revertants from a slow growing mutant (altered at positions 839 and 876) shows that they did not compensate for the mutation by re-establishing the original wild type sequence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.