Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (590K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (53)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nocentini, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nocentini, S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1987, Vol. 15, No. 10 4211-4225
© 1987


Articles

Inhibition of DNA replication and repair by cadmium in mammalian cells. Protective interaction of zinc

S. Nocentini

Institut Curie, Section de Biologie, 26 rue d'Ulm 75231 Paris Cédex 05, France

Received February 23, 1987. Revised April 24, 1987. Accepted April 24, 1987.

The effects of the treatment of cultured human and simian cells with Cadmium (Cd), a toxic and carcinogenic metal, were first assayed on macromolecular synthesis. It was observed that DNA synthesis was inhibited by Cd concentrations considerably lower than those inhibiting protein and RNA synthesis. Because of the necessary occurrence of a DNA resynthesis step during the DNA excision repair process, the consequences of the exposure of cells to Cd were ulteriorly tested on different parameters measuring DNA repair after ultraviolet (UV) damage. UV-induced unscheduled DNA synthesis (UDS) was found 2–3 times lower in Cd (4 x 10–6 m) treated cells than in control cells for UV doses higher than 10 J/m2. DNA breaks accumulated in UV-irradiated cells during post-exposure incubation in presence of Cd, whereas they were induced only transiently in control cells irradiated with the same dose. Cd inhibited in a concentration-dependent way the recovery of RNA transcription impaired by UV-irradiation. However, at concentrations used, Cd had no significant effects on DNA size and on rRNA synthesis in unirradiated cells. Finally, Cd was shown to inhibit the repair of potentially lethal damage during a 24 h liquid holding and to increase the toxicity of UV-irradiation.

The interactions between Cd and Zinc (Zn), an essential metal for many enzymatic proteins, were also analysed. Results showed that Zn, at 5 to 10 times higher concentrations, counteracts the inhibitory effects of Cd on DNA synthesis and restores, at least partially, the repair capability of cells and their survival. The possible molecular level and mechanism of action of these metals are discussed.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
S. S. Roy, S. Mukherjee, S. Mukhopadhyay, and S. K. Das
Differential effect of cadmium on cholinephosphotransferase activity in normal and cancerous human mammary epithelial cell lines
Mol. Cancer Ther., February 1, 2004; 3(2): 199 - 204.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CarcinogenesisHome page
G. W. Buchko, N. J. Hess, and M. A. Kennedy
Cadmium mutagenicity and human nucleotide excision repair protein XPA: CD, EXAFS and 1H/15N-NMR spectroscopic studies on the zinc(II)- and cadmium(II)-associated minimal DNA-binding domain (M98-F219)
Carcinogenesis, May 1, 2000; 21(5): 1051 - 1057.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
G. G. Schwartz and I. M. Reis
Is Cadmium a Cause of Human Pancreatic Cancer?
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2000; 9(2): 139 - 145.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. Meplan, K. Mann, and P. Hainaut
Cadmium Induces Conformational Modifications of Wild-type p53 and Suppresses p53 Response to DNA Damage in Cultured Cells
J. Biol. Chem., October 29, 1999; 274(44): 31663 - 31670.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.