Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (1896K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (15)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Legault, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cech, T. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Legault, P.
Right arrow Articles by Cech, T. R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1992, Vol. 20, No. 24 6613-6619
© 1992


ENZYMOLOGY

Mutations at the guanosine-binding site of the Tetrahymena ribozyme also affect site-specific hydrolysis

Pascale Legault, Daniel Herschlag+, Daniel W. Celander§ and Thomas R. Cech*

Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Colorado Boulder, CO 80309-0215, USA

*To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received September 3, 1992. Revised November 20, 1992. Accepted November 20, 1992.

Self-splicing group I introns use guanosine as a nucleophile to cleave the 5' splice site. The guanosinebinding site has been localized to the G264–C311 base pair of the Tetrahymena intron on the basis of analysis of mutations that change the specificity of the nucleophile from G (guanosine) to 2AP (2-aminopurine ribonucleoside) (F. Michel et al. (1989) Nature 342, 391–395). We studied the effect of these mutations (GU, A-C and A-U replacing G264–C311) in the L-21 Scal version of the Tetrahymena ribozyme. In this enzymatic system (kcat/Km)G monitors the cleavage step. This kinetic parameter decreased by at least 5x103 when the G264–C311 base pair was mutated to an A-U pair, while (kcat/Km)2AP increased at least 40-fold. This amounted to an overall switch in specificity of at least 2x10g. The nucleophile specificity (G > 2AP for the G-C and G-U pairs, 2AP > G for the A-U and A-C pairs) was consistent with the proposed hydrogen bond between the nucleotlde at position 264 and N1 of the nucleophile. Unexpectedly, the A-U and A-C mutants showed a decrease of an order of magnitude in the rate of ribozyme-catalyzed hydrolysis of RNA, in which H2O or OH replaces G as the nucleophlie, whereas the G-U mutant showed a decrease of only 2-fold. The low hydrolysis rates were not restored by raising the Mg2+ concentration or lowering the temperature. in addition, the mutant ribozymes exhibited a pattern of cleavage by Fe(II)-EDTA indistinguishable from that of the wild type, and the [Mg2+]1/2 for folding of the A-U mutant ribozyme was the same as that of the wild type. Therefore the guanosine-binding site mutations do not appear to have a major effect on RNA folding or stability. Because changing G264 affects the hydrolysis reaction without perturbing the global folding of the RNA, we conclude that the catalytic role of this conserved nucleotide is not limited to guanosine binding.


+Present address: Department of Biochemistry, Beckman Center, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5307 USA

§Present address: Department of Microbiology, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.