Nucleic Acids Research, 1994, Vol. 22, No. 21 4386-4394
© 1994
MOLECULAR BIOLOGY |
SARs stimulate but do not confer position independent gene expression

Departments of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, University of Geneva 30 Quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
*To whom correspondence should be addressed at; Laboratoire de Biologie Moléculaire Eucaryote, CNRS UPR 9006, 118 route de Narbonne, 31062 Toulous, France
Received July 28, 1994. Revised September 20, 1994. Accepted September 20, 1994.
Two minimal scaffold-associated regions (SARs) from Drosophila were tested in stably transformed cells for their effects on the expression of reporter genes. The expression of genes bounded by two SARs is consistently stimulated by about 20- to 40-fold, if the average of a pool of cell transformants is analyzed. However, analysis of individual, stable cell transformants demonstrates that flanking SAR elements do not confer position-independent expression on the reporter gene and that the extent of position-dependent variegation is similarly large with or without the flanking SAR elements. The SAR stimulation of expression is observed in stable but not in transiently transfected cell lines. The Drosophila scs and scs' boundary elements, which do not bind to the nuclear matrix in vitro, are only about one-tenth as active as SARs in stimulating expression in stable transformants. Interestingly, the SAR stimulatory effect can be blocked by a fragment containing CpG islands ( {small tilde}70% GC), if positioned between the SAR and the enhancer. In contrast, when inserted in the same position, control fragments, such as the scs/scs' elements, do not interfere with SAR function.
+Present address: Department of Animal Biology, University of Geneva, 154 route de Malagnou, 1224 Chêne-Bougeries
Department of Cellular Biology, university of Geneva, 30, Quai Ernest-Ansermet, CH 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. J. Namciu and R. E. K. Fournier Human Matrix Attachment Regions Are Necessary for the Establishment but Not the Maintenance of Transgene Insulation in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Cell. Biol., December 1, 2004; 24(23): 10236 - 10245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Jasinskiene, C. J. Coates, A. Ashikyan, and A. A. James High efficiency, site-specific excision of a marker gene by the phage P1 cre-loxP system in the yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2003; 31(22): e147 - e147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Byrd and V. G. Corces Visualization of chromatin domains created by the gypsy insulator of Drosophila J. Cell Biol., August 18, 2003; 162(4): 565 - 574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Mlynarova, A. Loonen, E. Mietkiewska, R. C. Jansen, and J.-P. Nap Assembly of Two Transgenes in an Artificial Chromatin Domain Gives Highly Coordinated Expression in Tobacco Genetics, February 1, 2002; 160(2): 727 - 740. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M. Shewchuk, N. E. Cooke, and S. A. Liebhaber The human growth hormone locus control region mediates long-distance transcriptional activation independent of nuclear matrix attachment regions Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2001; 29(16): 3356 - 3361. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. van der Vlag, J. L. den Blaauwen, R. G. A. B. Sewalt, R. van Driel, and A. P. Otte Transcriptional Repression Mediated by Polycomb Group Proteins and Other Chromatin-associated Repressors Is Selectively Blocked by Insulators J. Biol. Chem., January 7, 2000; 275(1): 697 - 704. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. W. EMERY and G. STAMATOYANNOPOULOS Stem Cell Gene Therapy for the {beta}-Chain Hemoglobinopathies: Problems and Progress Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., April 30, 1999; 872(1): 94 - 108. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Agarwal, T. W. Austin, F. Morel, J. Chen, E. Bohnlein, and I. Plavec Scaffold Attachment Region-Mediated Enhancement of Retroviral Vector Expression in Primary T Cells J. Virol., May 1, 1998; 72(5): 3720 - 3728. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. J. Namciu, K. B. Blochlinger, and R. E. K. Fournier Human Matrix Attachment Regions Insulate Transgene Expression from Chromosomal Position Effects in Drosophila melanogaster Mol. Cell. Biol., April 1, 1998; 18(4): 2382 - 2391. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
S. Nabirochkin, M. Ossokina, and T. Heidmann A Nuclear Matrix/Scaffold Attachment Region Co-localizes with the Gypsy Retrotransposon Insulator Sequence J. Biol. Chem., January 23, 1998; 273(4): 2473 - 2479. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Dickinson, C. D. Dickinson, and T. Kohwi-Shigematsu An Atypical Homeodomain in SATB1 Promotes Specific Recognition of the Key Structural Element in a Matrix Attachment Region J. Biol. Chem., April 25, 1997; 272(17): 11463 - 11470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. T. Antoniv, S. De Val, D. Wells, C. P. Denton, C. Rabe, B. de Crombrugghe, F. Ramirez, and G. Bou-Gharios Characterization of an Evolutionarily Conserved Far-upstream Enhancer in the Human alpha 2(I) Collagen (COL1A2) Gene J. Biol. Chem., June 8, 2001; 276(24): 21754 - 21764. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






