Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (848K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bisant, D.
Right arrow Articles by Maizel, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bisant, D.
Right arrow Articles by Maizel, J.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1995, Vol. 23, No. 9 1632-1639
© 1995


COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY

Identification of ribosome binding sites in Escherichia coli using neural network models

David Bisant*, and Jacob Maizel1

Neuroscience Program (151 B), Stanford University Stanford, CA 94305, USA 1National Cancer Institute, FCRF Building 469, Room 151, PO Box B, Frederick, MD 21701, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed

Received August 26, 1994. Revised February 8, 1995. Accepted February 8, 1995.

This study investigated the use of neural networks in the identification of Escherichia coll ribosome binding sites. The recognition of these sites based on primary sequence data is difficult due to the multiple determinants that define them. Additionally, secondary structure plays a significant role In the determination of the site and this information is difficult to include in the models. Efforts to solve this problem have so far yielded poor results. A new compilation of E.coll ribosome binding sites was generated for this study. Feedforward backpropagatlon networks were applied to their identification. Perceptions were also applied, since they have been the previous best method since 1982. Evaluation of performance for all the neural networks and perceptrons was determined by ROC analysis. The neural network provided significant improvement In the recognition of these sites when compared with the previous best method, finding less than half the number of false positives when both models were adjusted to find an equal number of actual sites. The best neural network used an input window of 101 nucleotides and a single hidden layer of 9 units. Both the neural network and the perceptron trained on the new compilation performed better than the original perceptron published by Stormo et al. in 1982.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.