Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (90K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Poot, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Duin, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Poot, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by van Duin, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 26, Issue 2 549-553, Copyright © 1998 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Base complementarity in helix 2 of the central pseudoknot in 16S rRNA is essential for ribosome functioning

RA Poot, SH van den Worm, CWA Pleij and J van Duin
Leiden Institute of Chemistry, Gorlaeus Laboratories, Leiden University, PO Box 9502, 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands.

Helix 2 of the central pseudoknot structure in Escherichia coli 16S rRNA is formed by a long-distance interaction between nt 17-19 and 918- 916, resulting in three base pairs: U17-A918, C18-G917and A19-U916. Previous work has shown that disruption of the central base pair abolishes ribosomal activity. We have mutated the first and last base pairs and tested the mutants for their translational activity in vivo , using a specialized ribosome system. Mutations that disrupt Watson- Crick base pairing result in strongly impaired translational activity. An exception is the mutation U916-->G, creating an A.G pair, which shows almost no decrease in activity. Mutations that maintain base complementarity have little or no impact on translational efficiency. Some of the introduced base pair substitutions substantially alter the stability of helix 2, but this does not influence ribosome functioning, neither at 42 nor at 28 degrees C. Therefore, our results do not support models in which the pseudoknot is periodically disrupted. Rather, the central pseudoknot structure is suggested to function as a permanent structural element necessary for proper organization in the center of the 30S subunit.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 RNAHome page
S. T. Gregory and A. E. Dahlberg
Genetic and structural analysis of base substitutions in the central pseudoknot of Thermus thermophilus 16S ribosomal RNA
RNA, February 1, 2009; 15(2): 215 - 223.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. M. Chubiz and C. V. Rao
Computational design of orthogonal ribosomes
Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2008; 36(12): 4038 - 4046.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RNAHome page
N. Kirthi, B. Roy-Chaudhuri, T. Kelley, and G. M. Culver
A novel single amino acid change in small subunit ribosomal protein S5 has profound effects on translational fidelity
RNA, December 1, 2006; 12(12): 2080 - 2091.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 RNAHome page
F. BELANGER, G. THEBERGE-JULIEN, P. R. CUNNINGHAM, and L. BRAKIER-GINGRAS
A functional relationship between helix 1 and the 900 tetraloop of 16S ribosomal RNA within the bacterial ribosome
RNA, June 1, 2005; 11(6): 906 - 913.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Nucleic Acids ResHome page
I. Kanevsky, N. Vasilenko, H. Dumay-Odelot, and P. Fosse
In vitro characterization of a base pairing interaction between the primer binding site and the minimal packaging signal of avian leukosis virus genomic RNA
Nucleic Acids Res., December 15, 2003; 31(24): 7070 - 7082.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.