Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (68K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ke, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, C. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ke, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Foster, C. S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Nucleic acid amplification
Right arrow Miscellaneous/other
Right arrow Monitoring gene expression
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, Vol 27, Issue 3 912-914, Copyright © 1999 by Oxford University Press

ARTICLES

Systematic comparison of gene expression through analysis of cDNA fragments within or near to the protein-coding region

Y Ke, C Jing, PS Rudland, PH Smith and CS Foster
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and School of Biological Sciences, Liverpool University, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK. yqk@liv.ac.uk

Life is controlled by the timely and ordered expression of genes. Identification of important genes involved in specific physiological and pathological conditions requires efficient methods to analyse differential gene expression. We describe a novel strategy, namely complete comparison of gene expression (CCGE), for a systematic assessment of differentially expressed genes. Using the CCGE method, double-stranded cDNA is digested with two restriction enzymes that cut with different frequencies, the representative cDNA fragments are generated within or near to the protein-coding region. After being flanked by two different types of adapters, and amplified by a nested suppression PCR, the selected cDNA fragments, representing entire cDNA population, can be divided into 256 subsets; amplified and compared in a systematic manner.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
C. Jing, M. A. El-Ghany, C. Beesley, C. S. Foster, P. S. Rudland, P. Smith, and Y. Ke
Tazarotene-Induced Gene 1 (TIG1) Expression in Prostate Carcinomas and Its Relationship to Tumorigenicity
J Natl Cancer Inst, April 3, 2002; 94(7): 482 - 490.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
C. Jing, C. Beesley, C. S. Foster, H. Chen, P. S. Rudland, D. C. West, H. Fujii, P. H. Smith, and Y. Ke
Human Cutaneous Fatty Acid-binding Protein Induces Metastasis by Up-Regulating the Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Gene in Rat Rama 37 Model Cells
Cancer Res., June 1, 2001; 61(11): 4357 - 4364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Cancer Res.Home page
C. Jing, C. Beesley, C. S. Foster, P. S. Rudland, H. Fujii, T. Ono, H. Chen, P. H. Smith, and Y. Ke
Identification of the Messenger RNA for Human Cutaneous Fatty Acid-binding Protein as a Metastasis Inducer
Cancer Res., May 1, 2000; 60(9): 2390 - 2398.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.