Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (521K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schaub, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carbon, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schaub, M.
Right arrow Articles by Carbon, P.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, Vol. 28, No. 10 2114-2121
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Structural organization of Staf–DNA complexes

Myriam Schaub, Alain Krol and Philippe Carbon*

UPR 9002 du CNRS ‘Structure des Macromolécules Biologiques et Mécanismes de Reconnaissance’, IBMC, 15 rue René Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France

The transactivator Staf, which contains seven conti­g­uous zinc fingers of the C2-H2 type, exerts its effects on gene expression by binding to specific targets in vertebrate small nuclear RNA (snRNA) and snRNA-type gene promoters. Here, we have investigated the interaction of the Staf zinc finger domain with the optimal Xenopus selenocysteine tRNA (xtRNASec) and human U6 snRNA (hU6) Staf motifs. Generation of a series of polypeptides containing increasing numbers of Staf zinc fingers tested in binding assays, by interference techniques and by binding site selection served to elucidate the mode of interaction between the zinc fingers and the Staf motifs. Our results provide strong evidence that zinc fingers 3–6 represent the minimal zinc finger region for high affinity binding to Staf motifs. Furthermore, we show that the binding of Staf is achieved through a broad spectrum of close contacts between zinc fingers 1–6 and xtRNASec or optimal sites or between zinc fingers 3–6 and the hU6 site. Extensive DNA major groove contacts contribute to the interaction with Staf that associates more closely with the non-template than with the template strand. Based on these findings and the structural information provided by the solved structures of other zinc finger–DNA complexes, we propose a model for the interaction between Staf zinc fingers and the xtRNASec, optimal and hU6 sites.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 3 88 41 70 64; Fax: +33 3 88 60 22 18; Email: p.carbon@ibmc.u-strasbg.fr


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
V. P. Kelly, T. Suzuki, O. Nakajima, T. Arai, Y. Tamai, S. Takahashi, S. Nishimura, and M. Yamamoto
The Distal Sequence Element of the Selenocysteine tRNA Gene Is a Tissue-Dependent Enhancer Essential for Mouse Embryogenesis
Mol. Cell. Biol., May 1, 2005; 25(9): 3658 - 3669.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Biol. Chem.Home page
C. E. Grossman, Y. Qian, K. Banki, and A. Perl
ZNF143 Mediates Basal and Tissue-specific Expression of Human Transaldolase
J. Biol. Chem., March 26, 2004; 279(13): 12190 - 12205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.