Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (156K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Merino, E.
Right arrow Articles by Garciarrubio, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Merino, E.
Right arrow Articles by Garciarrubio, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, Vol. 28, No. 12 2431-2438
© 2000 Oxford University Press

The global intrinsic curvature of archaeal and eubacterial genomes is mostly contained in their dinucleotide composition and is probably not an adaptation

Enrique Merino and Alejandro Garciarrubio*

Institute for Biotechnology, National University of Mexico, Cuernavaca, Apelo 510-3, Morelos 62250, Mexico

Until now, the genomic DNA of all eubacteria analyzed has been hyper-curved, its global intrinsic curvature being higher than that of a random sequence. In contrast, that rule failed for archaea or eukaryotes, which could be either hypo- or hyper-curved. The existence of the rule suggested that, at least for eubacteria, global intrinsic curvature is adaptive. However, the present results from analyzing 21 eubacterial and six archaeal genomes argue against adaptation. First, there are two eubacterial exceptions to the former rule. More significantly, we found that the dinucleotide composition of the genome alone (which lacks all sequence information) is enough to determine the genome curvature. Additional evidence against adaptation came from showing that the global curvature of bacterial genomes could not have evolved under either of two complementary models of curvature selection: (i) that curvature is selected locally from unbiased variability; (ii) that curvature is established globally through the selection of a curvature-altering mutational bias. We found that the observed relationship between curvature and dinucleotide composition is incompatible with model (i). We also found that, contrary to the predictions of model (ii), the dinucleo­tide compositions of bacterial genomes were not statistically special in their curvature-related properties (when compared to stochastically generated dinucleotide compositions).

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +52 5 622 7605; Fax: +52 7 317 2388; Email: alejandr@ibt.unam.mx The authors wish it to be known that, in their opinion, both should be regarded as joint First Authors


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.