Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (589K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (11)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Articles by Kemper, B.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, Vol. 28, No. 5 1126-1132
© 2000 Oxford University Press

Tissue-specific chromatin structure of the phenobarbital- responsive unit and proximal promoter of CYP2B1/2 and modulation by phenobarbital

Jongsook Kim, Ilia Rivera-Rivera and Byron Kemper*

Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology and College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA

Phenobarbital induction of transcription of CYP2B genes is mediated by an enhancer, termed a phenobarbital responsive unit (PBRU), ~2000 bp 5' of the transcription start site. To further delineate the mechanism of phenobarbital induction, protein binding in native chromatin and the nucleosomal structure of the PBRU and proximal promoter were examined in liver and kidney, in which the CYP2B1/2 genes are expressed and not expressed, respectively. Protein binding to the PBRU in kidney chromatin was not detected even though in vitro DNase I footprints were not detectably different with nuclear extracts from liver and kidney. Likewise, protein binding to regulatory motifs was not detected in the proximal promoter region in kidney chromatin. In liver chromatin, however, DNase I hypersensitivity and partial protection of the regulatory motifs from DNase I digestion or reaction with dimethyl sulfate was observed and phenobarbital treatment increased the hypersensitivity but only modestly affected protection. Low resolution Southern analysis of micrococcal nuclease-digested chromatin from untreated rats revealed micrococcal nuclease hypersensitive regions in the proximal promoter and PBRU regions in liver, but not in kidney. Phenobarbital treatment increased hyper­sensitivity in liver in both regions. Micrococcal nuclease hypersensitivity in the PBRU was largely restricted to a linker region between phased nucleosomes while in the proximal promoter hypersensitivity extended over ~200 bp suggesting disruption of a nucleosome in this region. These data indicate that in liver phenobarbital treatment substantially alters protein binding to regulatory motifs in the PBRU, while not greatly affecting such binding in the proximal promoter, and substantially alters chromatin structure in both regions, presumably as a result of chromatin modifying factors recruited to the PBRU. In the kidney, chromatin is probably in a closed conformation that prevents binding of regulatory factors.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed at: Department of Molecular and Integrative Physiology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 524 Burrill Hall, 407 S. Goodwin, Urbana, IL 61801, USA. Tel: +1 217 333 1146; Fax: +1 217 333 1133; Email: kemper@life.uiuc.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
J. K. Kemper, H. Kim, J. Miao, S. Bhalla, and Y. Bae
Role of an mSin3A-Swi/Snf Chromatin Remodeling Complex in the Feedback Repression of Bile Acid Biosynthesis by SHP
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 1, 2004; 24(17): 7707 - 7719.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Endocrinol.Home page
K. Swales and M. Negishi
CAR, Driving into the Future
Mol. Endocrinol., July 1, 2004; 18(7): 1589 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
C. Handschin and U. A. Meyer
Induction of Drug Metabolism: The Role of Nuclear Receptors
Pharmacol. Rev., December 1, 2003; 55(4): 649 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
Y. Paquet, E. Trottier, M.-J. Beaudet, and A. Anderson
Mutational Analysis of the CYP2B2 Phenobarbital Response Unit and Inhibitory Effect of the Constitutive Androstane Receptor on Phenobarbital Responsiveness
J. Biol. Chem., December 1, 2000; 275(49): 38427 - 38436.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Kim, G. Min, and B. Kemper
Chromatin Assembly Enhances Binding to the CYP2B1 Phenobarbital-responsive Unit (PBRU) of Nuclear Factor-1, Which Binds Simultaneously with Constitutive Androstane Receptor (CAR)/Retinoid X Receptor (RXR) and Enhances CAR/RXR-mediated Activation of the PBRU
J. Biol. Chem., March 2, 2001; 276(10): 7559 - 7567.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.