Nucleic Acids Research, 2000, Vol. 28, No. 6 1332-1339
© 2000 Oxford University Press
Interactions of the human, rat, Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli 3-methyladenine-DNA glycosylases with DNA containing dIMP residues
Groupe Réparation des lésions Radio- et Chimio-Induites, UMR 8532 CNRS, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 Villejuif Cedex, France and 1UMR 9921 CNRS, 15, Avenue Charles Flahaut, 34060 Montpellier Cedex, France
In DNA, the deamination of dAMP generates 2'-deoxyinosine 5'-monophosphate (dIMP). Hypoxanthine (HX) residues are mutagenic since they give rise to A·T
G·C transition. They are excised, although with different efficiencies, by an activity of the 3-methyladenine (3-meAde)-DNA glycosylases from Escherichia coli (AlkA protein), human cells (ANPG protein), rat cells (APDG protein) and yeast (MAG protein). Comparison of the kinetic constants for the excision of HX residues by the four enzymes shows that the E.coli and yeast enzymes are quite inefficient, whereas for the ANPG and the APDG proteins they repair the HX residues with an efficiency comparable to that of alkylated bases, which are believed to be the primary substrates of these DNA glycosylases. Since the use of various substrates to monitor the activity of HX-DNA glycosylases has generated conflicting results, the efficacy of the four 3-meAde-DNA glycosylases of different origin was compared using three different substrates. Moreover, using oligonucleotides containing a single dIMP residue, we investigated a putative sequence specificity of the enzymes involving the bases next to the HX residue. We found up to 25-fold difference in the rates of HX excision between the various sequences of the oligonucleotides studied. When the dIMP residue was placed opposite to each of the four bases, a preferential recognition of dI:T over dI:dG, dI:dC and dI:dA mismatches was observed for both human (ANPG) and E.coli (AlkA) proteins. At variance, the yeast MAG protein removed more efficiently HX from a dI:dG over dI:dC, dI:T and dI:dA mismatches.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 1 42114824; Fax: +33 1 42114454; Email: jlaval@igr.fr
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
B. Budke and A. Kuzminov Hypoxanthine Incorporation Is Nonmutagenic in Escherichia coli. J. Bacteriol., September 1, 2006; 188(18): 6553 - 6560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nakano, A. Katafuchi, R. Shimizu, H. Terato, T. Suzuki, H. Tauchi, K. Makino, M. Skorvaga, B. Van Houten, and H. Ide Repair activity of base and nucleotide excision repair enzymes for guanine lesions induced by nitrosative stress Nucleic Acids Res., April 14, 2005; 33(7): 2181 - 2191. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. M. Hitchcock, L. Dong, E. E. Connor, L. B. Meira, L. D. Samson, M. D. Wyatt, and W. Cao Oxanine DNA Glycosylase Activity from Mammalian Alkyladenine Glycosylase J. Biol. Chem., September 10, 2004; 279(37): 38177 - 38183. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Saparbaev, S. Langouet, C. V. Privezentzev, F. P. Guengerich, H. Cai, R. H. Elder, and J. Laval 1,N2-Ethenoguanine, a Mutagenic DNA Adduct, Is a Primary Substrate of Escherichia coli Mismatch-specific Uracil-DNA Glycosylase and Human Alkylpurine-DNA-N-Glycosylase J. Biol. Chem., July 19, 2002; 277(30): 26987 - 26993. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. H. Chung, J. H. Back, Y. I. Park, and Y. S. Han Biochemical characterization of a novel hypoxanthine/xanthine dNTP pyrophosphatase from Methanococcus jannaschii Nucleic Acids Res., July 15, 2001; 29(14): 3099 - 3107. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


