Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 15 3145-3153
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Bulged residues promote the progression of a loop–loop interaction to a stable and inhibitory antisense–target RNA complex
UPR 9002 du CNRS, Institut de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, 15 rue Rene Descartes, 67084 Strasbourg Cedex, France and 1Institute of Cell and Molecular Biology, Biomedical Center, Uppsala University, Box 596, Husargatan 3, S-75124 Uppsala, Sweden
In several groups of bacterial plasmids, antisense RNAs regulate copy number through inhibition of replication initiator protein synthesis. These RNAs are characterized by a long hairpin structure interrupted by several unpaired residues or bulged loops. In plasmid R1, the inhibitory complex between the antisense RNA (CopA) and its target mRNA (CopT) is characterized by a four-way junction structure and a side-by-side helical alignment. This topology facilitates the formation of a stabilizer intermolecular helix between distal regions of both RNAs, essential for in vivo control. The bulged residues in CopA/CopT were shown to be required for high in vitro binding rate and in vivo activity. This study addresses the question of why removal of bulged nucleotides blocks stable complex formation. Structure mapping, modification interference, and molecular modeling of bulged-less mutant CopA–CopT complexes suggests that, subsequent to loop–loop contact, helix propagation is prevented. Instead, a fully base paired loop–loop interaction is formed, inducing a continuous stacking of three helices. Consequently, the stabilizer helix cannot be formed, and stable complex formation is blocked. In contrast to the four-way junction topology, the loop–loop interaction alone failed to prevent ribosome binding at its loading site and, thus, inhibition of RepA translation was alleviated.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 3 88 41 70 51; Fax: +33 3 88 60 22 18; Email: p.romby{at}ibmc.u-strasbg.fr
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  R. Cheng, C. Miao, Q. Gong, Y. Gu, X. Lu, F. Han, and W. Yu Specific gene silencing by artificial trans-encoded small noncoding RNAs in bacteria Nucleic Acids Res., May 27, 2009; (2009) gkp447v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. M. Kwong, R. A. Skurray, and N. Firth Replication Control of Staphylococcal Multiresistance Plasmid pSK41: an Antisense RNA Mediates Dual-Level Regulation of Rep Expression. J. Bacteriol., June 1, 2006; 188(12): 4404 - 4412. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Yu and L. Markoff The Topology of Bulges in the Long Stem of the Flavivirus 3' Stem-Loop Is a Major Determinant of RNA Replication Competence J. Virol., February 15, 2005; 79(4): 2309 - 2324. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
C. S. Hibbert, J. Mirro, and A. Rein mRNA Molecules Containing Murine Leukemia Virus Packaging Signals Are Encapsidated as Dimers J. Virol., October 15, 2004; 78(20): 10927 - 10938. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. BARTSCH, S. VOIGTSBERGER, G. BAUMANN, I. MORANO, and H. P. LUTHER Detection of a novel sense-antisense RNA-hybrid structure by RACE experiments on endogenous troponin I antisense RNA RNA, August 1, 2004; 10(8): 1215 - 1224. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. M. Sturino and T. R. Klaenhammer Antisense RNA Targeting of Primase Interferes with Bacteriophage Replication in Streptococcus thermophilus Appl. Envir. Microbiol., March 1, 2004; 70(3): 1735 - 1743. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. G. Slagter-Jager and E. G. H. Wagner Loop Swapping in an Antisense RNA/Target RNA Pair Changes Directionality of Helix Progression J. Biol. Chem., September 12, 2003; 278(37): 35558 - 35563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Gubbins, D. C. Arthur, A. F. Ghetu, J. N. M. Glover, and L. S. Frost Characterizing the Structural Features of RNA/RNA Interactions of the F-plasmid FinOP Fertility Inhibition System J. Biol. Chem., July 18, 2003; 278(30): 27663 - 27671. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|