Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 15 3188-3194
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Role of DNA minor groove interactions in substrate recognition by the M.SinI and M.EcoRII DNA (cytosine-5) methyltransferases
Institute of Biochemistry, Biological Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, PO Box 521, Szeged 6701, Hungary
The SinI and EcoRII DNA methyltransferases recognize sequences (GGA/TCC and CCA/TGG, respectively), which are characterized by an A/T ambiguity. Recognition of the A·T and T·A base pair was studied by in vitro methyltransferase assays using oligonucleotide substrates containing a hypoxanthine·C base pair in the central position of the recognition sequence. Both enzymes methylated the substituted oligonucleotide with an efficiency that was comparable to methylation of the canonical substrate. These observations indicate that M.SinI and M.EcoRII discriminate between their canonical recognition site and the site containing a G·C or a C·G base pair in the center of the recognition sequence (GGG/CCC and CCG/CGG, respectively) by interaction(s) in the DNA minor groove. M.SinI mutants displaying a decreased capacity to discriminate between the GGA/TCC and GGG/CCC sequences were isolated by random mutagenesis and selection for the relaxed specificity phenotype. These mutations led to amino acid substitutions outside the variable region, previously thought to be the sole determinant of sequence specificity. These observations indicate that A/T versus G/C discrimination is mediated by interactions between the large domain of the methyltransferase and the minor groove surface of the DNA.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +36 62 432 080; Fax: +36 62 433 506; Email: kissa{at}nucleus.szbk.u-szeged.hu Present address:Gábor Zsurka, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Vienna Biocenter, Dr Bohr-Gasse 9, A-1030 Vienna, Austria
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
M. Sokolowska, H. Czapinska, and M. Bochtler Crystal structure of the {beta}{beta}{alpha}-Me type II restriction endonuclease Hpy99I with target DNA Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2009; 37(11): 3799 - 3810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Timar, P. Venetianer, and A. Kiss In Vivo DNA Protection by Relaxed-Specificity SinI DNA Methyltransferase Variants J. Bacteriol., December 15, 2008; 190(24): 8003 - 8008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Timar, G. Groma, A. Kiss, and P. Venetianer Changing the recognition specificity of a DNA-methyltransferase by in vitro evolution Nucleic Acids Res., July 25, 2004; 32(13): 3898 - 3903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. M. Cohen, D. S. Tawfik, and A. D. Griffiths Altering the sequence specificity of HaeIII methyltransferase by directed evolution using in vitro compartmentalization Protein Eng. Des. Sel., January 1, 2004; 17(1): 3 - 11. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y.-F. Lee, D. S. Tawfik, and A. D. Griffiths Investigating the target recognition of DNA cytosine-5 methyltransferase HhaI by library selection using in vitro compartmentalisation Nucleic Acids Res., November 15, 2002; 30(22): 4937 - 4944. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


