Nucleic Acids Research, 2001, Vol. 29, No. 3 693-702
© 2001 Oxford University Press
Induced fit DNA recognition by a minor groove binding analogue of Hoechst 33258: fluctuations in DNA A tract structure investigated by NMR and molecular dynamics simulations
Department of Chemistry and 1School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK
NMR analysis and molecular dynamics simulations of d(GGTAATTACC)2 and its complex with a tetrahydropyrimidinium analogue of Hoechst 33258 suggest that DNA minor groove recognition in solution involves a combination of conformational selection and induced fit, rather than binding to a preorganised site. Analysis of structural fluctuations in the bound and unbound states suggests that the degree of induced fit observed is primarily a consequence of optimising van der Waals contacts with the walls of the minor groove resulting in groove narrowing through: (i) changes in base step parameters, including increased helical twist and propeller twist; (ii) changes to the sugarphosphate backbone conformation to engulf the bound ligand; (iii) suppression of bending modes at the TpA steps. In contrast, the geometrical arrangement of hydrogen bond acceptors on the groove floor appears to be relatively insensitive to DNA conformation (helical twist and propeller twist). We suggest that effective recognition of DNA sequences (in this case an A tract structure) appears to depend to a significant extent on the sequence being flexible enough to be able to adopt the geometrically optimal conformation compatible with the various binding interactions, rather than involving lock and key recognition.
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 115 951 3567; Fax: +44 115 951 3564; Email: mark.searle{at}nottingham.ac.uk
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J. Lah, I. Drobnak, M. Dolinar, and G. Vesnaver What drives the binding of minor groove-directed ligands to DNA hairpins? Nucleic Acids Res., February 11, 2008; 36(3): 897 - 904. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. D. Goodwin, E. C. Long, and M. M. Georgiadis A host-guest approach for determining drug-DNA interactions: an example using netropsin Nucleic Acids Res., July 27, 2005; 33(13): 4106 - 4116. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Chen, J. A. Parkinson, O. Novakova, J. Bella, F. Wang, A. Dawson, R. Gould, S. Parsons, V. Brabec, and P. J. Sadler Induced-fit recognition of DNA by organometallic complexes with dynamic stereogenic centers PNAS, December 9, 2003; 100(25): 14623 - 14628. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. L. Olsen, E. A. Louie, G. P. Drobny, and S. Th. Sigurdsson Determination of DNA minor groove width in distamycin-DNA complexes by solid-state NMR Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2003; 31(17): 5084 - 5089. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Gonzalez, M. Moore, S. Ribeiro, U. Schmitz, G. P. Schroth, L. Turin, and T. W. Bruice The hybridization-stabilization assay: a solution-based isothermal method for rapid screening and determination of sequence preference of ligands that bind to duplexed nucleic acids Nucleic Acids Res., August 15, 2001; 29(16): e85 - e85. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

