Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (432K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (13)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Vens, C.
Right arrow Articles by Begg, A. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Vens, C.
Right arrow Articles by Begg, A. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 13 2995-3004
© 2002 Oxford University Press

The role of DNA polymerase ß in determining sensitivity to ionizing radiation in human tumor cells

Conchita Vens, Els Dahmen-Mooren, Manon Verwijs-Janssen, Wim Blyweert, Lise Graversen, Harry Bartelink1 and Adrian C. Begg*

Division of Experimental Therapy and 1 Department of Radiotherapy, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, 1066 CX Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Lethal lesions after ionizing radiation are thought to be mainly unrepaired or misrepaired DNA double-strand breaks, ultimately leading to lethal chromosome aberrations. However, studies with radioprotectors and repair inhibitors indicate that single-strand breaks, damaged nucleotides or abasic sites can also influence cell survival. This paper reports on studies to further define the role of base damage and base excision repair on the radiosensitivity of human cells. We retrovirally transduced human tumor cells with a dominant negative form of DNA polymerase ß, comprising the 14 kDa DNA-binding domain of DNA polymerase ß but lacking polymerase function. Radiosensitization of two human carcinoma cell lines, A549 and SQD9, was observed, achieving dose enhancement factors of 1.5–1.7. Sensitization was dependent on expression level of the dominant negative and was seen in both single cell clones and in unselected virally transduced populations. Sensitization was not due to changes in cell cycle distribution. Little or no sensitization was seen in G1-enriched populations, indicating cell cycle specificity for the observed sensitization. These results contrast with the lack of effect seen in DNA polymerase ß knockout cells, suggesting that polDN also inhibits the long patch, DNA polymerase ß-independent repair pathway. These data demonstrate an important role for BER in determining sensitivity to ionizing radiation and might help identify targets for radiosensitizing tumor cells.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +31 20 512 2036; Fax: +31 20 512 2050; Email: a.begg{at}nki.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
B. A. Sokhansanj and D. M. Wilson III
Estimating the effect of human base excision repair protein variants on the repair of oxidative DNA base damage.
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., May 1, 2006; 15(5): 1000 - 1008.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
G. P. Amorino, R. B. Mikkelsen, K. Valerie, and R. K. Schmidt-Ullrich
Dominant-negative cAMP-responsive Element-binding Protein Inhibits Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen and DNA Repair, Leading to Increased Cellular Radiosensitivity
J. Biol. Chem., August 8, 2003; 278(32): 29394 - 29399.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.