Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (132K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sterrenburg, E.
Right arrow Articles by den Dunnen, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sterrenburg, E.
Right arrow Articles by den Dunnen, J. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Microarray
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 21 e116
© 2002 Oxford University Press

A common reference for cDNA microarray hybridizations

Ellen Sterrenburg, Rolf Turk, Judith M. Boer, Gertjan B. van Ommen and Johan T. den Dunnen*

Center for Human and Clinical Genetics, Leiden University Medical Center, Wassenaarseweg 72, 2333AL Leiden, Nederland

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +31 71 527 6105; Fax: +31 71 527 6075; Email: ddunnen{at}lumc.nl

Comparisons of expression levels across different cDNA microarray experiments are easier when a common reference is co-hybridized to every microarray. Often this reference consists of one experimental control sample, a pool of cell lines or a mix of all samples to be analyzed. We have developed an alternative common reference consisting of a mix of the products that are spotted on the array. Pooling part of the cDNA PCR products before they are printed and their subsequent amplification towards either sense or antisense cRNA provides an excellent common reference. Our results show that this reference yields a reproducible hybridization signal in 99.5% of the cDNA probes spotted on the array. Accordingly, a ratio can be calculated for every spot, and expression levels across different hybridizations can be compared. In dye-swap experiments this reference shows no significant ratio differences, with 95% of the spots within an interval of ±0.2-fold change. The described method can be used in hybridizations with both amplified and non-amplified targets, is time saving and provides a constant batch of common reference that lasts for thousands of hybridizations.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Biomol ScreenHome page
C.-L. Chang
Genome-Wide Oligonucleotide Microarray Analysis of Gene-Expression Profiles of Taiwanese Patients with Anaplastic Astrocytoma and Glioblastoma Multiforme
J Biomol Screen, October 1, 2008; 13(9): 912 - 921.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Physiol. GenomicsHome page
X. Mu, L. D. Brown, Y. Liu, and M. F. Schneider
Roles of the calcineurin and CaMK signaling pathways in fast-to-slow fiber type transformation of cultured adult mouse skeletal muscle fibers
Physiol Genomics, August 20, 2007; 30(3): 300 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
The OncologistHome page
M. van de Vijver
Gene-Expression Profiling and the Future of Adjuvant Therapy
Oncologist, October 1, 2005; 10(suppl_2): 30 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ReproductionHome page
C. A White and L. A Salamonsen
A guide to issues in microarray analysis: application to endometrial biology
Reproduction, July 1, 2005; 130(1): 1 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C.-W. Wei, J.-Y. Cheng, C.-T. Huang, M.-H. Yen, and T.-H. Young
Using a microfluidic device for 1 {micro}l DNA microarray hybridization in 500 s
Nucleic Acids Res., May 12, 2005; 33(8): e78 - e78.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BioinformaticsHome page
M.-L. Martin-Magniette, J. Aubert, E. Cabannes, and J.-J. Daudin
Evaluation of the gene-specific dye bias in cDNA microarray experiments
Bioinformatics, May 1, 2005; 21(9): 1995 - 2000.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
B. A. Williams, R. M. Gwirtz, and B. J. Wold
Genomic DNA as a cohybridization standard for mammalian microarray measurements
Nucleic Acids Res., June 9, 2004; 32(10): e81 - e81.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. Brodsky, A. Leontovich, M. Shtutman, and E. Feinstein
Identification and handling of artifactual gene expression profiles emerging in microarray hybridization experiments
Nucleic Acids Res., March 3, 2004; 32(4): e46 - e46.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C Napoli, L O Lerman, V Sica, A Lerman, G Tajana, and F de Nigris
Microarray analysis: a novel research tool for cardiovascular scientists and physicians
Heart, June 1, 2003; 89(6): 597 - 604.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. A. C. 't Hoen, F. de Kort, G. J. B. van Ommen, and J. T. den Dunnen
Fluorescent labelling of cRNA for microarray applications
Nucleic Acids Res., March 1, 2003; 31(5): e20 - e20.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.