Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (214K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pastink, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by van den Bosch, M.
Right arrow Articles by Pastink, A.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 6 1316-1324
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Differential expression and requirements for Schizosaccharomyces pombe RAD52 homologs in DNA repair and recombination

Michael van den Bosch, José B. M. Zonneveld, Kees Vreeken, Femke A. T. de Vries, Paul H. M. Lohman and Albert Pastink*

MGC Department of Radiation Genetics and Chemical Mutagenesis, Leiden University Medical Center, Wassenaarseweg 72, 2333 AL Leiden, The Netherlands

In fission yeast two RAD52 homologs have been identified, rad22A+ and rad22B+. Two-hybrid experiments and GST pull-down assays revealed physical interaction between Rad22A and Rad22B, which is dependent on the N-terminal regions. Interaction with Rhp51 is dependent on the C-terminal parts of either protein. Both Rad22A and Rad22B also interact with RPA. The expression of rad22B+ in mitotically dividing cells is very low in comparison with rad22A+ but is strongly enhanced after induction of meiosis, in contrast to rad22A+. Rad22B mutant cells are not hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents (X-rays, UV and cisplatin) and display normal levels of recombination. In these respects the Schizosaccharomyces pombe rad22B mutant resembles the weak phenotype of vertebrate cells deficient for RAD52. Mutation of rad22A+ leads to severe sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and to defects in recombination. In a rad22Arad22B double mutant a further increase in sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents and additional mitotic recombination defects were observed. The data presented here indicate that Rad22A and Rad22B have overlapping roles in repair and recombination, although specialized functions for each protein cannot be excluded.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +31 71 5276152; Fax: +31 71 5276173; Email: a.pastink{at}lumc.nl


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
G. Octobre, A. Lorenz, J. Loidl, and J. Kohli
The Rad52 Homologs Rad22 and Rti1 of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Are Not Essential for Meiotic Interhomolog Recombination, but Are Required for Meiotic Intrachromosomal Recombination and Mating-Type-Related DNA Repair
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2399 - 2412.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. Decottignies
Microhomology-Mediated End Joining in Fission Yeast Is Repressed by Pku70 and Relies on Genes Involved in Homologous Recombination
Genetics, July 1, 2007; 176(3): 1403 - 1415.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Res.Home page
A. B. Herrero, C. Martin-Castellanos, E. Marco, F. Gago, and S. Moreno
Cross-Talk between Nucleotide Excision and Homologous Recombination DNA Repair Pathways in the Mechanism of Action of Antitumor Trabectedin
Cancer Res., August 15, 2006; 66(16): 8155 - 8162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. Biol.Home page
F. Osman, J. Dixon, A. R. Barr, and M. C. Whitby
The F-Box DNA Helicase Fbh1 Prevents Rhp51-Dependent Recombination without Mediator Proteins
Mol. Cell. Biol., September 15, 2005; 25(18): 8084 - 8096.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
C. L. Doe, F. Osman, J. Dixon, and M. C. Whitby
DNA repair by a Rad22-Mus81-dependent pathway that is independent of Rhp51
Nucleic Acids Res., October 14, 2004; 32(18): 5570 - 5581.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
J. A. Young, R. W. Hyppa, and G. R. Smith
Conserved and Nonconserved Proteins for Meiotic DNA Breakage and Repair in Yeasts
Genetics, June 1, 2004; 167(2): 593 - 605.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Molecular Cancer TherapeuticsHome page
R. C.A.M. van Waardenburg, L. A. de Jong, F. van Delft, M. A.J. van Eijndhoven, M. Bohlander, M.-A. Bjornsti, J. Brouwer, and J. H.M. Schellens
Homologous recombination is a highly conserved determinant of the synergistic cytotoxicity between cisplatin and DNA topoisomerase I poisons
Mol. Cancer Ther., April 1, 2004; 3(4): 393 - 402.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eukaryot CellHome page
M. Malik and J. L. Nitiss
DNA Repair Functions That Control Sensitivity to Topoisomerase-Targeting Drugs
Eukaryot. Cell, February 1, 2004; 3(1): 82 - 90.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. L. Grishchuk and J. Kohli
Five RecA-like Proteins of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Are Involved in Meiotic Recombination
Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1031 - 1043.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Biol. CellHome page
M. G. Catlett and S. L. Forsburg
Schizosaccharomyces pombe Rdh54 (TID1) Acts with Rhp54 (RAD54) to Repair Meiotic Double-Strand Breaks
Mol. Biol. Cell, November 1, 2003; 14(11): 4707 - 4720.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
P. Meister, M. Poidevin, S. Francesconi, I. Tratner, P. Zarzov, and G. Baldacci
Nuclear factories for signalling and repairing DNA double strand breaks in living fission yeast
Nucleic Acids Res., September 1, 2003; 31(17): 5064 - 5073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.