Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (347K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (28)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mirny, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gelfand, M. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mirny, L. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gelfand, M. S.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 7 1704-1711
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Structural analysis of conserved base pairs in protein–DNA complexes

Leonid A. Mirny* and Mikhail S. Gelfand1

Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, Room 16-343D, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA and 1State Scientific Center ‘GosNIIGenetika’, 1st Dorozhny pr., 1, Moscow, Russia and Integrated Genomics, PO Box 348, Moscow, Russia

Understanding of protein–DNA interactions is crucial for prediction of DNA-binding specificity of transcription factors and design of novel DNA-binding proteins. In this paper we develop a novel approach to analysis of protein–DNA interactions. We bring together two sources of information: (i) structures of protein–DNA complexes (PDB/NDB database) and (ii) experimentally obtained sites recognized by DNA-binding proteins. Sites are used to compute conservation (information content) of each base pair, which indicates relative importance of the base pair in specific recognition. The main result of this study is that conservation of base pairs in a site exhibits significant correlation with the number of contacts the base pairs have with the protein. In particular, base pairs that have more contacts with the protein are more conserved in evolution. As natural as it is, this result has never been reported before. We also observe that for most of the studied proteins, hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic interactions alone cannot explain the pattern of evolutionary conservation in the binding site suggesting cumulative contribution of different types of interactions to specific recognition. Implications for prediction of the DNA-binding specificity are discussed.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: leonid{at}mit.edu


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
Z. Hobaika, L. Zargarian, Y. Boulard, R. G. Maroun, O. Mauffret, and S. Fermandjian
Specificity of LTR DNA recognition by a peptide mimicking the HIV-1 integrase {alpha}4 helix
Nucleic Acids Res., October 6, 2009; (2009) gkp824v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
K. B. S. Swamy, C.-Y. Cho, S. Chiang, Z. T.-Y. Tsai, and H.-K. Tsai
Impact of DNA-binding position variants on yeast gene expression
Nucleic Acids Res., September 18, 2009; (2009) gkp743v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
B. Contreras-Moreira
3D-footprint: a database for the structural analysis of protein-DNA complexes
Nucleic Acids Res., September 18, 2009; (2009) gkp781v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. Rodriguez-Garcia, A. Sola-Landa, K. Apel, F. Santos-Beneit, and J. F. Martin
Phosphate control over nitrogen metabolism in Streptomyces coelicolor: direct and indirect negative control of glnR, glnA, glnII and amtB expression by the response regulator PhoP
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2009; 37(10): 3230 - 3242.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Ahmad, O. Keskin, A. Sarai, and R. Nussinov
Protein-DNA interactions: structural, thermodynamic and clustering patterns of conserved residues in DNA-binding proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2008; 36(18): 5922 - 5932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
G. M. Cooper and C. D. Brown
Qualifying the relationship between sequence conservation and molecular function
Genome Res., February 1, 2008; 18(2): 201 - 205.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. K. Shultzaberger, L. R. Roberts, I. G. Lyakhov, I. A. Sidorov, A. G. Stephen, R. J. Fisher, and T. D. Schneider
Correlation between binding rate constants and individual information of E. coli Fis binding sites
Nucleic Acids Res., August 13, 2007; 35(16): 5275 - 5283.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
A. V. Morozov and E. D. Siggia
Connecting protein structure with predictions of regulatory sites
PNAS, April 24, 2007; 104(17): 7068 - 7073.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. K. Shultzaberger, Z. Chen, K. A. Lewis, and T. D. Schneider
Anatomy of Escherichia coli {sigma}70 promoters
Nucleic Acids Res., February 16, 2007; 35(3): 771 - 788.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
A. D. Gonzalez, V. Espinosa, A. T. Vasconcelos, E. Perez-Rueda, and J. Collado-Vides
TRACTOR_DB: a database of regulatory networks in gamma-proteobacterial genomes
Nucleic Acids Res., January 1, 2005; 33(suppl_1): D98 - D102.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. R. Chhabra, K. R. Shockley, S. B. Conners, K. L. Scott, R. D. Wolfinger, and R. M. Kelly
Carbohydrate-induced Differential Gene Expression Patterns in the Hyperthermophilic Bacterium Thermotoga maritima
J. Biol. Chem., February 21, 2003; 278(9): 7540 - 7552.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.