Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (150K) Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (36)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Brohede, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ellegren, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Brohede, J.
Right arrow Articles by Ellegren, H.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2002, Vol. 30, No. 9 1997-2003
© 2002 Oxford University Press

Heterogeneity in the rate and pattern of germline mutation at individual microsatellite loci

Jesper Brohede, Craig R. Primmer1, Anders Møller2 and Hans Ellegren*

Department of Evolutionary Biology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18D, SE-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden, 1Department of Ecology and Systematics, PO Box 17, University of Helsinki, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland and 2Laboratoire d’Ecologie Evolutive Parasitaire, CNRS FRE 2365, Universite Pierre et Marie Curie, Batiment A, 7eme Etage, 7 Quai St Bernard, Case 237, F-75252 Paris Cedex 5, France

There is a lack of information on how individual microsatellite loci differ with respect to their mutation properties. Such variation will have an important bearing on our understanding of the ubiquitous occurrence of simple repeat sequences in eukaryotic genomes and on deriving proper mutation models that can be incorporated into genetic distance estimates. We genotyped ~100 families of the bird barn swallow (Hirundo rustica) for two hypervariable (heterozygosity >95%) microsatellite markers: HrU6, an (AAAG)n tetranucleotide repeat, and HrU10, an (AAGAG)n pentanucleotide repeat. A total of 27 germline mutation events were documented, corresponding to mutation rates of 0.57% (HrU6) and 1.56% (HrU10). The mutation rate increased with allele size, at ~0.1% per repeat unit over the observed range of allele sizes (~10–100 repeat units). Single repeat unit changes dominated, with 21/27 mutations representing the gain or loss of one repeat unit. There was no clear difference in the number of gains versus losses nor was there an effect of allele size on the magnitude or direction of mutation. Unexpectedly, the mutation rate of females (maternally transmitted mutations) was 2.5–5 times higher than that of males. Contrasting these observations with mutation data from other microsatellite loci reveals differences not only in the mutation rate, but also in the magnitude, direction and effect of sex on mutation. Thus, microsatellite mutation and evolution may be viewed as a dynamic and variable process.

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +46 18 4716460; Fax: +46 18 4716310; Email: hans.ellegren{at}ebc.uu.se


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A.-L. Raquin, F. Depaulis, A. Lambert, N. Galic, P. Brabant, and I. Goldringer
Experimental Estimation of Mutation Rates in a Wheat Population With a Gene Genealogy Approach
Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 2195 - 2211.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
A. L. Seyfert, M. E. A. Cristescu, L. Frisse, S. Schaack, W. K. Thomas, and M. Lynch
The Rate and Spectrum of Microsatellite Mutation in Caenorhabditis elegans and Daphnia pulex
Genetics, April 1, 2008; 178(4): 2113 - 2121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
D. Malysheva, O. N. Tokarskaya, V. G. Petrosyan, F. D. Danielyan, I. S. Darevsky, and A. P. Ryskov
Genomic Variation in Parthenogenetic Lizard Darevskia armeniaca: Evidence from DNA Fingerprinting Data
J. Hered., April 13, 2007; (2007) esm003v2.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
O. Paun and E. Horandl
Evolution of Hypervariable Microsatellites in Apomictic Polyploid Lineages of Ranunculus carpaticola: Directional Bias at Dinucleotide Loci
Genetics, September 1, 2006; 174(1): 387 - 398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GeneticsHome page
V. V. Symonds and A. M. Lloyd
An Analysis of Microsatellite Loci in Arabidopsis thaliana: Mutational Dynamics and Application
Genetics, November 1, 2003; 165(3): 1475 - 1488.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Genome ResHome page
D. Dieringer and C. Schlotterer
Two Distinct Modes of Microsatellite Mutation Processes: Evidence From the Complete Genomic Sequences of Nine Species
Genome Res., October 1, 2003; 13(10): 2242 - 2251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. Leblois, A. Estoup, and F. Rousset
Influence of Mutational and Sampling Factors on the Estimation of Demographic Parameters in a "Continuous" Population Under Isolation by Distance
Mol. Biol. Evol., April 1, 2003; 20(4): 491 - 502.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol Biol EvolHome page
R. M. Sibly, A. Meade, N. Boxall, M. J. Wilkinson, D. W. Corne, and J. C. Whittaker
The Structure of Interrupted Human AC Microsatellites
Mol. Biol. Evol., March 1, 2003; 20(3): 453 - 459.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J HeredHome page
D. N. Irion, A. L. Schaffer, T. R. Famula, M. L. Eggleston, S. S. Hughes, and N. C. Pedersen
Analysis of Genetic Variation in 28 Dog Breed Populations With 100 Microsatellite Markers
J. Hered., January 1, 2003; 94(1): 81 - 87.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.