Nucleic Acids Research, 2003, Vol. 31, No. 11 2852-2864
© 2003 Oxford University Press
The role of intercalating residues in chromosomal high-mobility-group protein DNA binding, bending and specificity
1 Department of Pharmacology, The University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, 4200 East Ninth Avenue, Denver, CO 80262, USA and 2 The Department of Biochemistry, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 600 South Matthews Avenue, Urbana, IL 61801, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 303 315 0427; Fax: +1 303 315 7097; Email: mair.churchill{at}uchsc.edu
Ubiquitous high-mobility-group (HMGB) chromosomal proteins bind DNA in a non-sequence- specific fashion to promote chromatin function and gene regulation. Minor groove DNA binding of the HMG domain induces substantial DNA bending toward the major groove, and several interfacial residues contribute by DNA intercalation. The role of the intercalating residues in DNA binding, bending and specificity was systematically examined for a series of mutant Drosophila HMGB (HMG-D) proteins. The primary intercalating residue of HMG-D, Met13, is required both for high-affinity DNA binding and normal DNA bending. Leu9 and Tyr12 directly interact with Met13 and are required for HMG domain stability in addition to linear DNA binding and bending, which is an important function for these residues. In contrast, DNA binding and bending is retained in truncations of intercalating residues Val32 and Thr33 to alanine, but DNA bending is decreased for the glycine substitutions. Furthermore, substitution of the intercalating residues with those predicted to be involved in the specificity of the HMG domain transcription factors results in increased DNA affinity and decreased DNA bending without increased specificity. These studies reveal the importance of residues that buttress intercalating residues and suggest that features of the HMG domain other than a few base-specific hydrogen bonds distinguish the sequence-specific and non-sequence-specific HMG domain functions.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Ray and A. Grove The yeast high mobility group protein HMO2, a subunit of the chromatin-remodeling complex INO80, binds DNA ends Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2009; 37(19): 6389 - 6399. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. A. Gangelhoff, P. S. Mungalachetty, J. C. Nix, and M. E. A. Churchill Structural analysis and DNA binding of the HMG domains of the human mitochondrial transcription factor A Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2009; 37(10): 3153 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Stros, E. Polanska, S. Struncova, and S. Pospisilova HMGB1 and HMGB2 proteins up-regulate cellular expression of human topoisomerase II{alpha} Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2009; 37(7): 2070 - 2086. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Jiang and M. M. Howe Regional mutagenesis of the gene encoding the phage Mu late gene activator C identifies two separate regions important for DNA binding Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2008; 36(20): 6396 - 6405. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. C. Roemer, J. Adelman, M. E. A. Churchill, and D. P. Edwards Mechanism of high-mobility group protein B enhancement of progesterone receptor sequence-specific DNA binding Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): 3655 - 3666. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.-Y. Chen, T.-P. Ko, T.-W. Lin, C.-C. Chou, C.-J. Chen, and A. H.-J. Wang Probing the DNA kink structure induced by the hyperthermophilic chromosomal protein Sac7d Nucleic Acids Res., January 14, 2005; 33(1): 430 - 438. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Kamau, K. T. Bauerle, and A. Grove The Saccharomyces cerevisiae High Mobility Group Box Protein HMO1 Contains Two Functional DNA Binding Domains J. Biol. Chem., December 31, 2004; 279(53): 55234 - 55240. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Ciubotaru and D. G. Schatz Synapsis of Recombination Signal Sequences Located in cis and DNA Underwinding in V(D)J Recombination Mol. Cell. Biol., October 1, 2004; 24(19): 8727 - 8744. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


