Published online 14 January 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, 2004, Vol. 32, No. 1 328-337
© 2004 Oxford University Press
TopNet: a tool for comparing biological sub-networks, correlating protein properties with topological statistics
Department of Molecular Biophysics and Biochemistry, 266 Whitney Avenue, Yale University, PO Box 208114, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 203 432 6105; Fax: +1 360 838 7861; Email: mark.gerstein{at}yale.edu
Biological networks are a topic of great current interest, particularly with the publication of a number of large genome-wide interaction datasets. They are globally characterized by a variety of graph-theoretic statistics, such as the degree distribution, clustering coefficient, characteristic path length and diameter. Moreover, real protein networks are quite complex and can often be divided into many sub-networks through systematic selection of different nodes and edges. For instance, proteins can be sub-divided by expression level, length, amino-acid composition, solubility, secondary structure and function. A challenging research question is to compare the topologies of sub- networks, looking for global differences associated with different types of proteins. TopNet is an automated web tool designed to address this question, calculating and comparing topological characteristics for different sub-networks derived from any given protein network. It provides reasonable solutions to the calculation of network statistics for sub-networks embedded within a larger network and gives simplified views of a sub-network of interest, allowing one to navigate through it. After constructing TopNet, we applied it to the interaction networks and protein classes currently available for yeast. We were able to find a number of potential biological correlations. In particular, we found that soluble proteins had more interactions than membrane proteins. Moreover, amongst soluble proteins, those that were highly expressed, had many polar amino acids, and had many alpha helices, tended to have the most interaction partners. Interestingly, TopNet also turned up some systematic biases in the current yeast interaction network: on average, proteins with a known functional classification had many more interaction partners than those without. This phenomenon may reflect the incompleteness of the experimentally determined yeast interaction network.
CiteULike 
Connotea 
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  Y. Assenov, F. Ramirez, S.-E. Schelhorn, T. Lengauer, and M. Albrecht Computing topological parameters of biological networks Bioinformatics, January 15, 2008; 24(2): 282 - 284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Y. Yip, H. Yu, P. M. Kim, M. Schultz, and M. Gerstein The tYNA platform for comparative interactomics: a web tool for managing, comparing and mining multiple networks Bioinformatics, December 1, 2006; 22(23): 2968 - 2970. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Yu and M. Gerstein Colloquium Papers: Genomic analysis of the hierarchical structure of regulatory networks PNAS, October 3, 2006; 103(40): 14724 - 14731. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. Song, S. Gao, R. Tian, S. Ma, H. Huang, J. Guo, Y. Li, L. Zhang, and Y. Gao A High Efficiency Strategy for Binding Property Characterization of Peptide-binding Domains Mol. Cell. Proteomics, August 1, 2006; 5(8): 1368 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Yu, A. Paccanaro, V. Trifonov, and M. Gerstein Predicting interactions in protein networks by completing defective cliques Bioinformatics, April 1, 2006; 22(7): 823 - 829. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Nagamine, Y. Kawada, and Y. Sakakibara Identifying cooperative transcriptional regulations using protein-protein interactions Nucleic Acids Res., August 26, 2005; 33(15): 4828 - 4837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|