Published online 2 August 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32 No. 13 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
Quantitative modeling of DNAprotein interactions: effects of amino acid substitutions on binding specificity of the Mnt repressor
Department of Genetics, Washington University, 660 S. Euclid, Box 8232, St Louis, MO 63110, USA
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 314 747 5534; Fax: +1 314 362 7855; Email: stormo{at}genetics.wustl.edu
Present address: Tsz-Kwong Man, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
Received May 27, 2004; Revised and Accepted July 10, 2004
Understanding DNAprotein recognition quantitatively is essential to developing computational algorithms for accurate transcriptional binding site prediction. Using a quantitative, multiple fluorescence, relative affinity (QuMFRA) assay, we determine the binding specificity of 11 different position 6 variants of the Mnt repressor for operators containing all 16 possible dinucleotides at operator positions 16 and 17. We show that the wild-type and all variant proteins interact with the two positions in a non-independent manner, but that a simple independent model provides a close approximation to the true binding affinities. The wild-type His at amino acid 6 is the only protein to prefer the AC sequence of the wild-type operator, whereas most of the variant proteins prefer TA. H6R is unique in having a strong preference for C at position 16. A comparison of the quantitative binding data for all of the protein variants with a model for recognition of the early growth response (EGR) zinc finger family suggests that interactions of Mnt with positions 16 and 17 are similar to interactions of EGR with positions 1 and 2, respectively. This information leads to an augmented model for the interaction of Mnt with its operator.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. A. Temiz and C. J. Camacho Experimentally based contact energies decode interactions responsible for protein-DNA affinity and the role of molecular waters at the binding interface Nucleic Acids Res., July 1, 2009; 37(12): 4076 - 4088. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Jamal Rahi, P. Virnau, L. A. Mirny, and M. Kardar Predicting transcription factor specificity with all-atom models Nucleic Acids Res., November 1, 2008; 36(19): 6209 - 6217. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Faiger, M. Ivanchenko, and T. E. Haran Nearest-neighbor non-additivity versus long-range non-additivity in TATA-box structure and its implications for TBP-binding mechanism Nucleic Acids Res., July 26, 2007; 35(13): 4409 - 4419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Zhang, S. Kasif, and a. C. R. Cantor Quantifying DNA-protein binding specificities by using oligonucleotide mass tags and mass spectroscopy PNAS, February 27, 2007; 104(9): 3061 - 3066. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Liu and G. D. Stormo Combining SELEX with quantitative assays to rapidly obtain accurate models of protein-DNA interactions Nucleic Acids Res., September 25, 2005; 33(17): e141 - e141. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

