Published online 7 September 2004
Nucleic Acids Research, Vol. 32 No. 16 © Oxford University Press 2004; all rights reserved
Gene co-regulation is highly conserved in the evolution of eukaryotes and prokaryotes
Nijmegen Center for Molecular Life Sciences, University Medical Center St Radboud, p/a CMBI, Toernooiveld 1, 6525 ED Nijmegen, The Netherlands
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +31 24 36 53375; Fax: +31 24 36 52977; Email: snel{at}cmbi.kun.nl
Received May 13, 2004; Revised July 14, 2004; Accepted August 21, 2004
Differences between species have been suggested to largely reside in the network of connections among the genes. Nevertheless, the rate at which these connections evolve has not been properly quantified. Here, we measure the extent to which co-regulation between pairs of genes is conserved over large phylogenetic distances; between two eukaryotes Caenorhabditis elegans and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and between two prokaryotes Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. We first construct a reliable set of co-regulated genes by combining various functional genomics data from yeast, and subsequently determine conservation of co-regulation in worm from the distribution of co-expression values. For B.subtilis and E.coli, we use known operons and regulons. We find that between 76 and 80% of the co-regulatory connections are conserved between orthologous pairs of genes, which is very high compared with previous estimates and expectations regarding network evolution. We show that in the case of gene duplication after speciation, one of the two inparalogous genes tends to retain its original co-regulatory relationship, while the other loses this link and is presumably free for differentiation or sub-functionalization. The high level of co-regulation conservation implies that reliably predicted functional relationships from functional genomics data in one species can be transferred with high accuracy to another species when that species also harbours the associated genes.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. H. Singh, D. M. Wolf, P. Wang, and A. P. Arkin Modularity of stress response evolution PNAS, May 27, 2008; 105(21): 7500 - 7505. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. R Kensche, V. van Noort, B. E Dutilh, and M. A Huynen Practical and theoretical advances in predicting the function of a protein by its phylogenetic distribution J R Soc Interface, February 6, 2008; 5(19): 151 - 170. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
X. Dai, J. He, and X. Zhao A new systematic computational approach to predicting target genes of transcription factors Nucleic Acids Res., July 26, 2007; 35(13): 4433 - 4440. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Spirin, M. S. Gelfand, A. A. Mironov, and L. A. Mirny A metabolic network in the evolutionary context: Multiscale structure and modularity PNAS, June 6, 2006; 103(23): 8774 - 8779. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Wels, C. Francke, R. Kerkhoven, M. Kleerebezem, and R. J. Siezen Predicting cis-acting elements of Lactobacillus plantarum by comparative genomics with different taxonomic subgroups Nucleic Acids Res., April 13, 2006; 34(7): 1947 - 1958. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Z. Zhao, L. Fang, N. Chen, R. C. Johnsen, L. Stein, and D. L. Baillie Distinct Regulatory Elements Mediate Similar Expression Patterns in the Excretory Cell of Caenorhabditis elegans J. Biol. Chem., November 18, 2005; 280(46): 38787 - 38794. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. A. Notebaart, M. A. Huynen, B. Teusink, R. J. Siezen, and B. Snel Correlation between sequence conservation and the genomic context after gene duplication Nucleic Acids Res., October 27, 2005; 33(19): 6164 - 6171. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Medina Genomes, phylogeny, and evolutionary systems biology PNAS, May 3, 2005; 102(suppl_1): 6630 - 6635. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||



