Published online 30 March 2005
Methods Online |
Towards standardization of RNA quality assessment using user-independent classifiers of microcapillary electrophoresis traces
Array s/IMAGE, Genexpress, Functional Genomics and Systems Biology for Health LGNUMR 7091, CNRS and Pierre and Marie Curie University of Paris 6, 7, rue Guy Môquet, 94801 Villejuif, France 1Agilent Technologies Waldbronn, Germany
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 0 1 49 58 35 13; Fax: +33 0 1 49 58 35 09; Email: imbeaud{at}vjf.cnrs.fr
Received January 14, 2005. Revised March 2, 2005. Accepted March 2, 2005.
While it is universally accepted that intact RNA constitutes the best representation of the steady-state of transcription, there is no gold standard to define RNA quality prior to gene expression analysis. In this report, we evaluated the reliability of conventional methods for RNA quality assessment including UV spectroscopy and 28S:18S area ratios, and demonstrated their inconsistency. We then used two new freely available classifiers, the Degradometer and RIN systems, to produce user-independent RNA quality metrics, based on analysis of microcapillary electrophoresis traces. Both provided highly informative and valuable data and the results were found highly correlated, while the RIN system gave more reliable data. The relevance of the RNA quality metrics for assessment of gene expression differences was tested by Q-PCR, revealing a significant decline of the relative expression of genes in RNA samples of disparate quality, while samples of similar, even poor integrity were found highly comparable. We discuss the consequences of these observations to minimize artifactual detection of false positive and negative differential expression due to RNA integrity differences, and propose a scheme for the development of a standard operational procedure, with optional registration of RNA integrity metrics in public repositories of gene expression data.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. H. Siggers, J. Siggers, M. Boye, T. Thymann, L. Molbak, T. Leser, B. B. Jensen, and P. T. Sangild Early Administration of Probiotics Alters Bacterial Colonization and Limits Diet-Induced Gut Dysfunction and Severity of Necrotizing Enterocolitis in Preterm Pigs J. Nutr., August 1, 2008; 138(8): 1437 - 1444. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Caesar and C. A. Drevon Pancreatic contamination of mesenteric adipose tissue samples can be avoided by adjusted dissection procedures J. Lipid Res., July 1, 2008; 49(7): 1588 - 1594. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. B. Rosen, B. D. Abbott, D. C. Wolf, J. C. Corton, C. R. Wood, J. E. Schmid, K. P. Das, R. D. Zehr, E. T. Blair, and C. Lau Gene Profiling in the Livers of Wild-type and PPAR{alpha}-Null Mice Exposed to Perfluorooctanoic Acid Toxicol Pathol, June 1, 2008; 36(4): 592 - 607. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Grundemann, F. Schlaudraff, O. Haeckel, and B. Liss Elevated {alpha}-synuclein mRNA levels in individual UV-laser-microdissected dopaminergic substantia nigra neurons in idiopathic Parkinson's disease Nucleic Acids Res., April 1, 2008; 36(7): e38 - e38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Lenzini, T. M. Seccia, E. Aldighieri, A. S. Belloni, P. Bernante, L. Giuliani, G. G. Nussdorfer, A. C. Pessina, and G. P. Rossi Heterogeneity of Aldosterone-Producing Adenomas Revealed by a Whole Transcriptome Analysis Hypertension, December 1, 2007; 50(6): 1106 - 1113. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Rebouissou, S. Imbeaud, C. Balabaud, V. Boulanger, J. Bertrand-Michel, F. Terce, C. Auffray, P. Bioulac-Sage, and J. Zucman-Rossi HNF1{alpha} Inactivation Promotes Lipogenesis in Human Hepatocellular Adenoma Independently of SREBP-1 and Carbohydrate-response Element-binding Protein (ChREBP) Activation J. Biol. Chem., May 11, 2007; 282(19): 14437 - 14446. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J S Reis-Filho, C Westbury, and J-Y Pierga The impact of expression profiling on prognostic and predictive testing in breast cancer. J. Clin. Pathol., March 1, 2006; 59(3): 225 - 231. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






