Published online 2 May 2006
Article |
Homologous recombination prevents methylation-induced toxicity in Escherichia coli
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Pharmacology, University of Massachusetts Medical School 364 Plantation Street, Worcester MA 01605 USA 1 Biological Engineering Division, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 508 856 3330; Fax: +1 508 856 2003; Email: martin.marinus{at}umassmed.edu
Received December 13, 2005. Revised January 4, 2006. Accepted March 27, 2006.
Methylating agents such as N-methyl-N'-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG) and methyl methane sulfonate (MMS) produce a wide variety of N- and O-methylated bases in DNA, some of which can block replication fork progression. Homologous recombination is a mechanism by which chromosome replication can proceed despite the presence of lesions. The two major recombination pathways, RecBCD and RecFOR, which repair double-strand breaks (DSBs) and single-strand gaps respectively, are needed to protect against toxicity with the RecBCD system being more important. We find that recombination-deficient cell lines, such as recBCD recF, and ruvC recG, are as sensitive to the cytotoxic effects of MMS and MNNG as the most base excision repair (BER)-deficient (alkA tag) isogenic mutant strain. Recombination and BER-deficient double mutants (alkA tag recBCD) were more sensitive to MNNG and MMS than the single mutants suggesting that homologous recombination and BER play essential independent roles. Cells deleted for the polA (DNA polymerase I) or priA (primosome) genes are as sensitive to MMS and MNNG as alkA tag bacteria. Our results suggest that the mechanism of cytotoxicity by alkylating agents includes the necessity for homologous recombination to repair DSBs and single-strand gaps produced by DNA replication at blocking lesions or single-strand nicks resulting from AP-endonuclease action.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. Sikora, D. Mielecki, A. Chojnacka, J. Nieminuszczy, M. Wrzesinski, and E. Grzesiuk Lethal and mutagenic properties of MMS-generated DNA lesions in Escherichia coli cells deficient in BER and AlkB-directed DNA repair Mutagenesis, November 5, 2009; (2009) gep052v1. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Odahara, H. Kuroiwa, T. Kuroiwa, and Y. Sekine Suppression of Repeat-Mediated Gross Mitochondrial Genome Rearrangements by RecA in the Moss Physcomitrella patens PLANT CELL, April 1, 2009; 21(4): 1182 - 1194. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Guthlein, R. M. Wanner, P. Sander, E. O. Davis, M. Bosshard, J. Jiricny, E. C. Bottger, and B. Springer Characterization of the Mycobacterial NER System Reveals Novel Functions of the uvrD1 Helicase J. Bacteriol., January 15, 2009; 191(2): 555 - 562. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. Klapacz, L. B. Meira, D. G. Luchetti, J. A. Calvo, R. T. Bronson, W. Edelmann, and L. D. Samson O6-methylguanine-induced cell death involves exonuclease 1 as well as DNA mismatch recognition in vivo PNAS, January 13, 2009; 106(2): 576 - 581. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Cejka and J. Jiricny Interplay of DNA Repair Pathways Controls Methylation Damage Toxicity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Genetics, August 1, 2008; 179(4): 1835 - 1844. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Mojas, M. Lopes, and J. Jiricny Mismatch repair-dependent processing of methylation damage gives rise to persistent single-stranded gaps in newly replicated DNA Genes & Dev., December 15, 2007; 21(24): 3342 - 3355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Davidsen, H. K. Tuven, M. Bjoras, E. A. Rodland, and T. Tonjum Genetic Interactions of DNA Repair Pathways in the Pathogen Neisseria meningitidis J. Bacteriol., August 1, 2007; 189(15): 5728 - 5737. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Donaldson, C. T. Courcelle, and J. Courcelle RuvABC Is Required to Resolve Holliday Junctions That Accumulate following Replication on Damaged Templates in Escherichia coli J. Biol. Chem., September 29, 2006; 281(39): 28811 - 28821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||






