Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on May 21, 2007
Nucleic Acids Research 2007 35(11):3741-3751; doi:10.1093/nar/gkm317
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nucleic Acids Research, 2007, Vol. 35, No. 11 3741-3751
© 2007 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Genomics |
Endonuclease-independent insertion provides an alternative pathway for L1 retrotransposition in the human genome
Department of Biological Sciences, Biological Computation and Visualization Center, Center for BioModular Multi-Scale Systems, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 225 578 7102; Fax: +1 225 578 7113; Email: mbatzer{at}lsu.edu
Received February 15, 2007. Revised April 15, 2007. Accepted April 16, 2007.
LINE-1 elements (L1s) are a family of highly successful retrotransposons comprising
17% of the human genome, the majority of which have inserted through an endonuclease-dependent mechanism termed target-primed reverse transcription. Recent in vitro analyses suggest that in the absence of non-homologous end joining proteins, L1 elements may utilize an alternative, endonuclease-independent pathway for insertion. However, it remains unknown whether this pathway operates in vivo or in cell lines where all DNA repair mechanisms are functional. Here, we have analyzed the human genome to demonstrate that this alternative pathway for L1 insertion has been active in recent human evolution and characterized 21 loci where L1 elements have integrated without signs of endonuclease-related activity. The structural features of these loci suggest a role for this process in DNA double-strand break repair. We show that endonuclease-independent L1 insertions are structurally distinguishable from classical L1 insertion loci, and that they are associated with inter-chromosomal translocations and deletions of target genomic DNA.
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
K. Ichiyanagi and N. Okada Mobility Pathways for Vertebrate L1, L2, CR1, and RTE Clade Retrotransposons Mol. Biol. Evol., June 1, 2008; 25(6): 1148 - 1157. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. P. Belancio, D. J. Hedges, and P. Deininger Mammalian non-LTR retrotransposons: For better or worse, in sickness and in health Genome Res., March 1, 2008; 18(3): 343 - 358. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

