Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on July 7, 2007
Nucleic Acids Research 2007 35(13):e92; doi:10.1093/nar/gkm490
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nucleic Acids Research, 2007, Vol. 35, No. 13 e92
© 2007 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Methods Online |
Analytical biochemistry of DNA–protein assemblies from crude cell extracts
1INSERM, U565 and 2MNHN, USM503, Département de ‘Régulations, développement et diversité moléculaire’, Laboratoire des Régulations et dynamique des génomes, CNRS, UMR5153, Acides nucléiques: dynamique, ciblage et fonctions biologiques, 57 rue Cuvier, CP26, Paris Cedex 05, F-75231, France
*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +33 1 40 79 37 10; Fax: +33 1 40 79 37 05; Email: praseuth{at}mnhn.fr Correspondence may also be addressed to Dr. Jean-Christophe François, Tel: +33 1 40 79 38 01; Fax: +33 1 40 79 37 05; Email: francois{at}mnhn.fr
Received March 16, 2007. Revised May 15, 2007. Accepted June 6, 2007.
Purification of specific DNA–protein complexes is a challenging task, as the involved interactions can be both electrostatic/H-bond and hydrophobic. The chromatographic stringency needed to obtain reasonable purifications uses salts and detergents. However, these components elicit the removal of proteins unspecifically bound to the chromatographic support itself, thus contaminating the purification products. In this work, a photocleavable linker connected the target oligonucleotidic sequence to the chromatographic beads so as to allow the irradiation-based release of the purified DNA–protein complexes off the beads. Our bioanalytical conditions were validated by purifying the tetracycline repressor protein onto a specific oligonucleotide. The purification factor was unprecedented, with a single contaminant. The robustness of our method was challenged by applying it to the purification of multiprotein assemblies forming onto DNA damage-mimicking oligonucleotides. The purified components were identified as well-known DNA repair proteins, and were shown to retain their enzymatic activities, as seen by monitoring DNA ligation products. Remarkably, kinase activities, also monitored, were found to be distinct on the beads and on the purified DNA–protein complexes, showing the benefits to uncouple the DNA–protein assemblies from the beads for a proper understanding of biochemical regulatory mechanisms involved in the DNA–protein assemblies.
The authors wish it to be known that, Dr J-C. François is considered as joint senior (last) author.