Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on October 11, 2007
Nucleic Acids Research 2007 35(20):6884-6894; doi:10.1093/nar/gkm810
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (2637K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (462K) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
35/20/6884    most recent
gkm810v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pollard, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bidichandani, S. I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pollard, L. M.
Right arrow Articles by Bidichandani, S. I.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2007, Vol. 35, No. 20 6884-6894
© 2007 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Molecular Biology

Deficiency of RecA-dependent RecFOR and RecBCD pathways causes increased instability of the (GAA·TTC)n sequence when GAA is the lagging strand template

Laura M. Pollard1, Yogesh K. Chutake1, Paul M. Rindler1 and Sanjay I. Bidichandani1,2,*

1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and 2Department of Pediatrics, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA

* To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +405 271 1360; Fax: +405 271 3910; Email: Sanjay-Bidichandani{at}ouhsc.edu

Received June 29, 2007. Revised September 17, 2007. Accepted September 18, 2007.

The most common mutation in Friedreich ataxia is an expanded (GAA·TTC)n sequence, which is highly unstable in human somatic cells and in the germline. The mechanisms responsible for this genetic instability are poorly understood. We previously showed that cloned (GAA·TTC)n sequences replicated in Escherichia coli are more unstable when GAA is the lagging strand template, suggesting erroneous lagging strand synthesis as the likely mechanism for the genetic instability. Here we show that the increase in genetic instability when GAA serves as the lagging strand template is seen in RecA-deficient but not RecA-proficient strains. We also found the same orientation-dependent increase in instability in a RecA+ temperature-sensitive E. coli SSB mutant strain (ssb-1). Since stalling of replication is known to occur within the (GAA·TTC)n sequence when GAA is the lagging strand template, we hypothesized that genetic stability of the (GAA·TTC)n sequence may require efficient RecA-dependent recombinational restart of stalled replication forks. Consistent with this hypothesis, we noted significantly increased instability when GAA was the lagging strand template in strains that were deficient in components of the RecFOR and RecBCD pathways. Our data implicate defective processing of stalled replication forks as a mechanism for genetic instability of the (GAA·TTC)n sequence.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
E. M. Kvikstad, F. Chiaromonte, and K. D. Makova
Ride the wavelet: A multiscale analysis of genomic contexts flanking small insertions and deletions
Genome Res., July 1, 2009; 19(7): 1153 - 1164.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.