Skip Navigation


Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access originally published online on January 30, 2008
Nucleic Acids Research 2008 36(5):1589-1598; doi:10.1093/nar/gkm1040
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (383K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (275K) Freely available
Right arrow Supplementary Data
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/5/1589    most recent
gkm1040v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Veprintsev, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fersht, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Veprintsev, D. B.
Right arrow Articles by Fersht, A. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Protein-nucleic acid interaction
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, Vol. 36, No. 5 1589-1598
© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Computational Biology

Algorithm for prediction of tumour suppressor p53 affinity for binding sites in DNA

Dmitry B. Veprintsev* and Alan R. Fersht

MRC Centre for Protein Engineering, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK

*To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +44 (0) 1223 402027; Fax: +44 (0) 1223 402140; Email: dbv{at}mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk

Received September 3, 2007. Revised October 30, 2007. Accepted October 31, 2007.

The tumour suppressor p53 is a transcription factor that binds DNA in the vicinity of the genes it controls. The affinity of p53 for specific binding sites relative to other DNA sequences is an inherent driving force for specificity, all other things being equal. We measured the binding affinities of systematically mutated consensus p53 DNA-binding sequences using automated fluorescence anisotropy titrations. Based on measurements of the effects of every possible single base-pair substitution of a consensus sequence, we defined the DNA sequence with the highest affinity for full-length p53 and quantified the effects of deviation from it on the strength of protein–DNA interaction. The contributions of individual nucleotides were to a first approximation independent and additive. But, in some cases we observed significant deviations from additivity. Based on affinity data, we constructed a binding predictor that mirrored the existing p53 consensus sequence definition. We used it to search for high-affinity binding sites in the genome and to predict the effects of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in these sites. Although there was some correlation between the Kd and biological function, the spread of the Kds by itself was not sufficient to explain the activation of different pathways by changes in p53 concentration alone.


Present address: Dmitry B. Veprintsev, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
S. Pikkarainen, R. A. Kennedy, A. K. Marshall, E. L. Tham, K. Lay, T. A. Kriz, B. S. Handa, A. Clerk, and P. H. Sugden
Regulation of Expression of the Rat Orthologue of Mouse Double Minute 2 (MDM2) by H2O2-induced Oxidative Stress in Neonatal Rat Cardiac Myocytes
J. Biol. Chem., October 2, 2009; 284(40): 27195 - 27210.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
B. Wang, Z. Xiao, and E. C. Ren
Redefining the p53 response element
PNAS, August 25, 2009; 106(34): 14373 - 14378.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USAHome page
E. Natan, D. Hirschberg, N. Morgner, C. V. Robinson, and A. R. Fersht
Ultraslow oligomerization equilibria of p53 and its implications
PNAS, August 25, 2009; 106(34): 14327 - 14332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Biol. Chem.Home page
J. Yan, D. Menendez, X.-P. Yang, M. A. Resnick, and A. M. Jetten
A Regulatory Loop Composed of RAP80-HDM2-p53 Provides RAP80-enhanced p53 Degradation by HDM2 in Response to DNA Damage
J. Biol. Chem., July 17, 2009; 284(29): 19280 - 19289.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
J. D. Sander, P. Zaback, J. K. Joung, D. F. Voytas, and D. Dobbs
An affinity-based scoring scheme for predicting DNA-binding activities of modularly assembled zinc-finger proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., February 1, 2009; 37(2): 506 - 515.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
S. Ahmad, O. Keskin, A. Sarai, and R. Nussinov
Protein-DNA interactions: structural, thermodynamic and clustering patterns of conserved residues in DNA-binding proteins
Nucleic Acids Res., October 1, 2008; 36(18): 5922 - 5932.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
L. Smeenk, S. J. van Heeringen, M. Koeppel, M. A. van Driel, S. J. J. Bartels, R. C. Akkers, S. Denissov, H. G. Stunnenberg, and M. Lohrum
Characterization of genome-wide p53-binding sites upon stress response
Nucleic Acids Res., June 1, 2008; 36(11): 3639 - 3654.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.