Skip Navigation

Erratum for de Murcia et al., Nucl. Acids Res. 5 (2) 523-535.
This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (24K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1978, Vol. 5, No. 4 1443
© 1978

Erratum

Erratum

Page 524, line 11 – then compared by using several biochemical and biophysical assays

Page 526, line 17 – the specimen was positively stained with a 50 µl drop of uranyl acetetate (1%, 30 sec.), washed with a 50 µl drop of distilled water (30 sec.), air dried.

Page 533, line 27 – observed with sheared chromatin (fig. 2)

Page 535, ref. 3 – Noll, M. (1974) Nature 251, 249–251.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.