Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (4112K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christie, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christie, N. T.
Right arrow Articles by Skinner, D. M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1980, Vol. 8, No. 2 279-298
© 1980


Article

Evidence for nonrandom alterations in a fraction of the highly repetitive DNA of a eukaryote

Nelwyn T. Christie and Dorothy M. Skinner*

University of Tennessee-Oak Ridge Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, and the Biology Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, USA

*To whome correspondence should be send

Received October 18, 1979. Although the DNA of the red crab Gerycm quinquadene has no patent satellites, a large fraction ({small tilde} 40%) is highly repetitive. Treatment of total DNA by Hind III produces fragments comprising 5–6% of the genome. While the sizes of some of these fragments form an arithmetic series based on an 81 bp repeating unit, the amounts of the multimers differ significantly from distributions observed for multimeric series in the DNAs of other eukaryotes. In red crab DNA, the amounts of some of the multimers suggest that they may have undergone as much as four times the divergence as the others. Other data, however, are more compatible with the conclusion that there has been selective amplification of segments of highly repeated DNA which results in the enhanced amount of specific multimers. These results indicate the presence of a nonrandom process in the evolution of the highly repetitive DNA. Selective mutation alone seems insufficient to explain these results.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.