Skip Navigation

This Article
Right arrow Print PDF (1999K)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (69)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chalkley, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nelson, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chalkley, R.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Nucleic Acids Research, 1980, Vol. 8, No. 8 1745-1763
© 1980


Articles

Segregation of rapidly acetylated histones into a chromatin fraction released from intact nuclei by the action of micrococcal nuclease

Daniel Nelson, Jonathan Covault and Roger Chalkley

Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Iowa Iowa City, IA 52242, USA

Received February 21, 1980. It has been previously shown that micrococcal nuclease digestion and subsequent fractionation of hen oviduct nuclei generates fractions enriched (first supernatant fraction - 1SF) and depleted (second supernatant fraction - 2SF) in ovalbumin genes, while a third fraction, the pellet fraction, contains about the same level of this gene as whole chromatin (Bloom and Anderson (1978) Cell 15, 141–150). We have utilized this fractionation method in an attempt to assess the extent and kinetics of histone acetylation associated with chromatin from the 1SF, 2SF, and pellet fraction.

Hepatoma Tissue Culture (HTC) cells were labelled for 30 minutes in vivo with 3H-acetate, nuclei isolated and the chromatin fractionated. The specific activity of the histones in the 1SF was slightly greater than that of the 2SF (1.2 to 1.6 fold difference) independent of the length of nuclease digestion. If the labelling period is followed by short (10 to 60 minute) treatment of the cells with sodium butyrate, the more rapidly as well as more extensively acetylated histones are also preferentially found in the 1SF. This 1s in part the result of segregation of chromatin particles into the 1SF as the histones associated with these particles become hyperacetylated. That is, the extent of histone acetylation regulates the distribution of chromatin in the 1SF, 2SF and pellet fraction.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.