Skip Navigation



Nucleic Acids Research Advance Access published online on September 12, 2008

Nucleic Acids Research, doi:10.1093/nar/gkn554
This Article
Right arrow Full Text Freely available
Right arrow Print PDF (2955K) Freely available
Right arrow Screen PDF (677K) Freely available
Right arrowOA All Versions of this Article:
36/18/5845    most recent
gkn554v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Commercial Re-use Guidelines
for Open Access NAR Content
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Martin, S. L.
Right arrow Articles by Williams, M. C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© 2008 The Author(s)
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0/uk/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Molecular Biology

A single amino acid substitution in ORF1 dramatically decreases L1 retrotransposition and provides insight into nucleic acid chaperone activity

Sandra L. Martin1,2,*, Diane Bushman1, Fei Wang3, Patrick Wai-Lun Li2, Ann Walker1, Jessica Cummiskey2, Dan Branciforte1 and Mark C. Williams3,4

1Department of Cell and Developmental Biology and Program in Molecular Biology, 2Human Medical Genetics Program, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO 80045, 3Department of Physics and 4Center for Interdisciplinary Research on Complex Systems, Northeastern University, 111 Dana Research Center, Boston, MA 02115, USA

To whom correspondence should be addressed. Tel: +1 303 724 3467; Fax: +1 303 724 3420; Email: sandy.martin{at}ucdenver.edu Correspondence may also be addressed to Mark C. Williams. Tel: +1 617 373 7323; Fax: +1 617 373 2943; Email: mark{at}neu.edu

Received June 23, 2008. Revised July 30, 2008. Accepted August 14, 2008.

L1 is a ubiquitous interspersed repeated sequence in mammals that achieved its high copy number by autonomous retrotransposition. Individual L1 elements within a genome differ in sequence and retrotransposition activity. Retrotransposition requires two L1-encoded proteins, ORF1p and ORF2p. Chimeric elements were used to map a 15-fold difference in retrotransposition efficiency between two L1 variants from the mouse genome, TFC and TFspa, to a single amino acid substitution in ORF1p, D159H. The steady-state levels of L1 RNA and protein do not differ significantly between these two elements, yet new insertions are detected earlier and at higher frequency in TFC, indicating that it converts expressed L1 intermediates more effectively into new insertions. The two ORF1 proteins were purified and their nucleic acid binding and chaperone activities were examined in vitro. Although the RNA and DNA oligonucleotide binding affinities of these two ORF1 proteins were largely indistinguishable, D159 was significantly more effective as a nucleic acid chaperone than H159. These findings support a requirement for ORF1p nucleic acid chaperone activity at a late step during L1 retrotransposition, extend the region of ORF1p that is known to be critical for its functional interactions with nucleic acids, and enhance understanding of nucleic acid chaperone activity.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.